2026-07-09 | The Genetics and Screening of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Adrenal Tumors.

Management of adrenal tumors and neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) requires careful discussion on whether resection with curative intent is worth the risk of surgical morbidity and risk of endocrine morbidity requiring exogenous hormonal replacement. Such deliberations are important in germline-associated NETs and adrenal tumors because of the multifocal nature of the disease. Identifying patients with germline mutations will encourage screening and surveillance to be more frequent compared to patients with sporadic-associated mutations. With improvements in molecular profiling, mutational patterns are more efficiently detected, allowing for more individualized treatment plans and potential future targeted therapies.

Open article ↗

2026-07-03 | [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide versus everolimus for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (COMPETE): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial.

Peptide receptor radionuclide and targeted therapy are both approved treatment options for patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs), but clinical evidence for preferred sequencing is scarce. The COMPETE trial evaluated the efficacy and harms of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy ([177Lu]Lu-edotreotide) versus targeted molecular therapy (everolimus) in patients with advanced, progressive, somatostatin receptor-positive GEP NETs. This phase 3, open-label, superiority trial included patients aged 18 years or older with treatment-naive or previously treated unresectable or metastatic (or both) grade 1-2 GEP NETs. Patients were enrolled from 49 specialist neuroendocrine tumour treatment centres across 14 countries in Africa, Europe, North America, and Oceania and randomised (2:1) to intravenous [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide (7·5 ± 0·7 GBq every 3 months, maximum four cycles) or oral everolimus (10 mg/day) for up to 30 months. Random assignment was via a central, web-based randomisation system (block size of 6) and stratified by primary tumour origin and previous therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed via blinded independent central review in all randomly assigned patients at 30 months. Harms were assessed in all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of a study drug. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03049189) and is no longer recruiting. Between April 13, 2017, and June 20, 2022, 324 patients were enrolled and 309 patients (including 168 [54%] male patients and 141 [46%] female patients) were randomly assigned to treatment: 207 to the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group and 102 to the everolimus group. The median follow-up for progression-free survival was 27·5 months (IQR 19·6-30·4) for the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group and 21·2 months (8·9-29·4) for the everolimus group. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide versus everolimus (23·9 months [95% CI 18·7-30·0] vs 14·1 months [9·2-20·9]; stratified hazard ratio 0·67 [95% CI 0·48-0·95]; p=0·022). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 178 (82%) of 217 patients in the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group and 96 (97%) of 99 patients in the everolimus group. 40 (18%) patients in the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group and 40 (40%) in the everolimus group had at least one treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse event. The most common treatment-related adverse events in the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group were diarrhoea and nausea (both 79 [36%] patients) and asthenia (66 [33%] patients), whereas those in the everolimus group were diarrhoea (45 [45%] patients), asthenia (36 [36%] patients), and anaemia (27 [27%] patients). No treatment-related deaths occurred in either study group. [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide led to statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival. Efficacy and harms results support the use of [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide in early lines of therapy in patients with advanced, progressive GEP NETs. ITM Solucin.

Open article ↗

2026-06-26 | Review of Haematological Toxicities in Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumours: A Case Report and Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Background: Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are heterogeneous neoplasms with several treatment options. Response rates, disease progression, and haematological toxicities can limit the use of some indicated treatments. Case Presentation: A 73-year-old woman with a well-differentiated grade 2 pancreatic NET (Ki-67 18%) underwent surgical resection and later developed hepatic recurrence. First-line treatment with sunitinib plus octreotide achieved temporary disease stabilisation. Upon progression, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE was initiated, resulting in stable disease but complicated by grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Two years later, PRRT retreatment was performed due to disease progression, which led to grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Further treatments with capecitabine and everolimus were limited by progression and significant thrombocytopenia. Therapy was switched to streptozocin plus 5-fluorouracil, which resulted in recovery of platelet counts, absence of haematological toxicity, and a sustained radiologic response until March 2025, when she presented with hepatic progression. FOLFOX chemotherapy was initiated but discontinued after one cycle due to severe thrombocytopenia. Deterioration in general condition ultimately led to supportive care and death in March 2026. Conclusions: This case highlights the risk of cumulative haematological toxicity with PRRT, particularly in retreatment settings. Careful patient selection and close monitoring are essential. Streptozocin-based chemotherapy may be an effective and well-tolerated alternative for patients with treatment-limiting toxicity.

Open article ↗