AI Drug Discovery for Pharma and Biotech

Drug discovery

15

drugs

With orphan designations

Overview

Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) involves structural brain damage with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 3-12, prolonged unconsciousness (>30 minutes), and post-traumatic amnesia [1][5][16]. These injuries often require acute neurosurgical intervention, multimodal monitoring, and long-term rehabilitation to address cognitive, motor, and behavioral deficits [3][5][13]. Mortality risks increase with severity, while survivors frequently face lifelong disability [6][10][16].

Population

  • Highest incidence in adults >75 years (320.8 hospitalizations/100,000), males (3x mortality vs females), and those with cardiovascular comorbidities [2][12][17]

  • 12.9% of older adults experience TBI over 18 years, with racial/ethnic disparities in care access [12]

Burden

  • 214,110 U.S. hospitalizations (2020); 57% survivors moderately-severely disabled at 5 years [6][17]

  • Annual U.S. economic cost: >$76 billion (50% from lost productivity) [5][17]

  • Leading causes: Falls (49% hospitalizations), motor vehicle crashes (25%), suicide (35% deaths) [2][17]

Therapies

  1. Acute care: ICP monitoring, osmotic therapy (mannitol), decompressive craniectomy [5][13][18]

  2. Pharmacologic: Anti-seizure prophylaxis, beta-blockers, amantadine for cognitive recovery [3][8][18]

  3. Rehabilitation: Multidisciplinary programs with cognitive therapy, physiotherapy, and vocational retraining [6][10][15]

Categories: rare neurological diseases

Research Papers

1,694 drug discovery papers related to Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury, with 3 first-in-class and 6 next-in-class early-stage therapies forecasted to outperform the average preclinical success rate. Recent publications:

1,694 drug discovery papers related to Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury, with 3 first-in-class and 6 next-in-class early-stage therapies forecasted to outperform the average preclinical success rate. Recent publications:

2026-07-05 | Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in Critically Ill Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Clinical Implications and Putative Mechanisms: a Narrative Review.

Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring intensive care is associated with high morbidity, mortality and long-term disability. In addition to neurologic sequelae, TBI causes a systemic disease with associated injury to other organ systems, including the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Here, we review the evidence that GI tract dysfunction occurs after TBI and discuss the clinical implications of GI tract dysfunction on the clinical care of TBI patients, including inadequate nutritional support, elevated risk of pneumonia, and a hyperactive inflammatory response. We highlight recent findings that highlight putative mechanisms through which GI tract pathology may arise after TBI, including vagal nerve and enteric nervous system dysfunction, gut microbiome dysbiosis, sympathetic hyperactivity and iatrogenic injury. Finally, we highlight future approaches to target the GI tract that could improve outcomes in this critically ill patient population. In summary, we review the evidence supporting a role for GI tract dysfunction in the pathophysiology of critically ill TBI patients and highlight potential mechanisms through which GI tract dysfunction may worsen outcomes in this population.

Open article ↗



2026-06-22 | Timing of fracture fixation for femur and pelvis fractures in patients with severe traumatic brain injury - an analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®.

Fracture fixation timing and strategy in polytrauma patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain controversial. This study investigates treatment patterns and outcomes for femoral and/or pelvic fractures stratified by TBI severity. Patients in the TraumaRegister DGU® (2016-2022) with pelvic and/or femoral fractures (AIS ≥3) and TBI (head AIS ≥3) were included. Strategies were non-operative management (NOM), early total care (ETC), and damage-control orthopedics (DCO). Outcomes included treatment allocation, fixation timing, and in-hospital mortality. 985 patients were included (mean age 52.5, SD 26.3 years; ISS 27.8, SD 8.1). Allocation was NOM in 320 (32.5%), ETC in 336 (34.1%), and DCO in 329 (33.4%) patients. Head AIS was 3 in 48.5%, 4 in 31.1%, and 5 in 20.3%. NOM patients were older, had the highest ISS and estimated mortality, and showed the largest proportion of critical TBI (AIS 5: NOM 30.9%, ETC 14.3%, DCO 16.1%). Femoral ETC was mainly performed within the first day (median 0, IQR 0-1 days), whereas pelvic ETC was delayed with increasing TBI severity (median 3, IQR 0-5 days for head AIS 3; 5, IQR 0-7 days for AIS 4). Observed mortality was 37.2% after NOM, 9.2% after ETC, and 10.3% after DCO. ETC in patients with moderate TBI (AIS 3) was associated with reduced observed mortality relative to NOM and matching DCO. Increasing TBI severity shifted practice patterns to DCO/NOM. These findings suggest that critical head injuries may prolong time to definitive fixation being associated with higher morbidity and mortality.

Open article ↗



2026-06-09 | Impact of IV metoclopramide + diphenhydramine on post-concussion symptoms. A secondary analysis of data from an ED-based randomized study.

In a randomized, placebo-controlled study, intravenous metoclopramide 20 mg + diphenhydramine 25 mg (M+D) improved post-concussion symptoms 1 h later among patients seeking care in an emergency department (ED) following head trauma. We performed a secondary hypothesis-generating analysis of those data to determine whether M+D is effective against cognitive and affective symptoms in addition to somatic symptoms, and whether post-treatment symptomatology is associated with 1-week and 1-month outcomes. We enrolled patients in two urban EDs in the Bronx, NY. Enrollment commenced in August 2017 and concluded in March 2020. Patients were included in the initial randomized controlled trial if they experienced head trauma and reported a new onset headache of at least moderate or severe intensity. We assessed post-concussion symptoms at 1 h, 1 week, and 1 month after treatment using the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), a 22-item instrument on which each symptom is graded as zero (none) through 6 (severe). We determined the impact of treatment, time, and their interaction on PCSS score. We repeated this analysis among the somatic, cognitive, and affective domains of the PCSS scale. Finally, we determined if post-treatment PCSS scores in the ED were associated with any severe symptom 1 week and 1 month later. Eighty-one participants received M+D; of those, 30 (37.0%) were female. Their mean age was 43.3 (standard deviation 16.1) years. All 81 provided 1-h data; 72 (89.9%) provided 1-week data; and 61 (75.3%) provided 1-month data. Seventy-nine received placebo; of those, 23 (29.1%) were female. Their mean age was 45.7 (SD 17.3) years. All 79 provided 1-h data; 67 (84.8%) provided 1-week data; and 54 (68.4%) 1-month data. At 1 h, the overall mean PCSS score was 20.8 (SD 20.2); at 1 week it was 17.4 (SD 23.0); and at 1 month it was 19.5 (SD 27.7). Participants who received M+D reported lower post-concussion symptom scores on the PCSS at 1 h (9.2 units lower, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0, 16.4) but not at 1 week (7.2, 95% CI: -0.4, 14.9) or 1 month (2.4, 95% CI: -5.9, 10.8). In the main mixed-effects model, there was a significant effect of treatment (p = 0.008), indicating overall lower PCSS scores in the M+D group across follow-up, although not for time (p = 0.289) or treatment-by-time interaction (p = 0.175). The treatment effect remained significant in the affective (p = 0.002) and cognitive (0.010) domains. PCSS scores prior to ED discharge were associated with severe symptoms at 1 week (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.04), but not 1 month (adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.04). In this exploratory secondary analysis, M+D improved post-concussive symptoms 1 h after treatment, including affective and cognitive post-concussion symptoms. PCSS scores after treatment are associated with 1-week but not 1-month outcomes.

Open article ↗



2026-07-05 | Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in Critically Ill Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Clinical Implications and Putative Mechanisms: a Narrative Review.

Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring intensive care is associated with high morbidity, mortality and long-term disability. In addition to neurologic sequelae, TBI causes a systemic disease with associated injury to other organ systems, including the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Here, we review the evidence that GI tract dysfunction occurs after TBI and discuss the clinical implications of GI tract dysfunction on the clinical care of TBI patients, including inadequate nutritional support, elevated risk of pneumonia, and a hyperactive inflammatory response. We highlight recent findings that highlight putative mechanisms through which GI tract pathology may arise after TBI, including vagal nerve and enteric nervous system dysfunction, gut microbiome dysbiosis, sympathetic hyperactivity and iatrogenic injury. Finally, we highlight future approaches to target the GI tract that could improve outcomes in this critically ill patient population. In summary, we review the evidence supporting a role for GI tract dysfunction in the pathophysiology of critically ill TBI patients and highlight potential mechanisms through which GI tract dysfunction may worsen outcomes in this population.

Open article ↗



2026-06-22 | Timing of fracture fixation for femur and pelvis fractures in patients with severe traumatic brain injury - an analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®.

Fracture fixation timing and strategy in polytrauma patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain controversial. This study investigates treatment patterns and outcomes for femoral and/or pelvic fractures stratified by TBI severity. Patients in the TraumaRegister DGU® (2016-2022) with pelvic and/or femoral fractures (AIS ≥3) and TBI (head AIS ≥3) were included. Strategies were non-operative management (NOM), early total care (ETC), and damage-control orthopedics (DCO). Outcomes included treatment allocation, fixation timing, and in-hospital mortality. 985 patients were included (mean age 52.5, SD 26.3 years; ISS 27.8, SD 8.1). Allocation was NOM in 320 (32.5%), ETC in 336 (34.1%), and DCO in 329 (33.4%) patients. Head AIS was 3 in 48.5%, 4 in 31.1%, and 5 in 20.3%. NOM patients were older, had the highest ISS and estimated mortality, and showed the largest proportion of critical TBI (AIS 5: NOM 30.9%, ETC 14.3%, DCO 16.1%). Femoral ETC was mainly performed within the first day (median 0, IQR 0-1 days), whereas pelvic ETC was delayed with increasing TBI severity (median 3, IQR 0-5 days for head AIS 3; 5, IQR 0-7 days for AIS 4). Observed mortality was 37.2% after NOM, 9.2% after ETC, and 10.3% after DCO. ETC in patients with moderate TBI (AIS 3) was associated with reduced observed mortality relative to NOM and matching DCO. Increasing TBI severity shifted practice patterns to DCO/NOM. These findings suggest that critical head injuries may prolong time to definitive fixation being associated with higher morbidity and mortality.

Open article ↗



2026-06-09 | Impact of IV metoclopramide + diphenhydramine on post-concussion symptoms. A secondary analysis of data from an ED-based randomized study.

In a randomized, placebo-controlled study, intravenous metoclopramide 20 mg + diphenhydramine 25 mg (M+D) improved post-concussion symptoms 1 h later among patients seeking care in an emergency department (ED) following head trauma. We performed a secondary hypothesis-generating analysis of those data to determine whether M+D is effective against cognitive and affective symptoms in addition to somatic symptoms, and whether post-treatment symptomatology is associated with 1-week and 1-month outcomes. We enrolled patients in two urban EDs in the Bronx, NY. Enrollment commenced in August 2017 and concluded in March 2020. Patients were included in the initial randomized controlled trial if they experienced head trauma and reported a new onset headache of at least moderate or severe intensity. We assessed post-concussion symptoms at 1 h, 1 week, and 1 month after treatment using the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), a 22-item instrument on which each symptom is graded as zero (none) through 6 (severe). We determined the impact of treatment, time, and their interaction on PCSS score. We repeated this analysis among the somatic, cognitive, and affective domains of the PCSS scale. Finally, we determined if post-treatment PCSS scores in the ED were associated with any severe symptom 1 week and 1 month later. Eighty-one participants received M+D; of those, 30 (37.0%) were female. Their mean age was 43.3 (standard deviation 16.1) years. All 81 provided 1-h data; 72 (89.9%) provided 1-week data; and 61 (75.3%) provided 1-month data. Seventy-nine received placebo; of those, 23 (29.1%) were female. Their mean age was 45.7 (SD 17.3) years. All 79 provided 1-h data; 67 (84.8%) provided 1-week data; and 54 (68.4%) 1-month data. At 1 h, the overall mean PCSS score was 20.8 (SD 20.2); at 1 week it was 17.4 (SD 23.0); and at 1 month it was 19.5 (SD 27.7). Participants who received M+D reported lower post-concussion symptom scores on the PCSS at 1 h (9.2 units lower, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0, 16.4) but not at 1 week (7.2, 95% CI: -0.4, 14.9) or 1 month (2.4, 95% CI: -5.9, 10.8). In the main mixed-effects model, there was a significant effect of treatment (p = 0.008), indicating overall lower PCSS scores in the M+D group across follow-up, although not for time (p = 0.289) or treatment-by-time interaction (p = 0.175). The treatment effect remained significant in the affective (p = 0.002) and cognitive (0.010) domains. PCSS scores prior to ED discharge were associated with severe symptoms at 1 week (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.04), but not 1 month (adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.04). In this exploratory secondary analysis, M+D improved post-concussive symptoms 1 h after treatment, including affective and cognitive post-concussion symptoms. PCSS scores after treatment are associated with 1-week but not 1-month outcomes.

Open article ↗



Access all drug discovery articles and probability of success in trials forecasts:

Access all drug discovery articles and probability of success in trials forecasts:

Drug Discovery Landscape

15 orphan drug designations for Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.

15 orphan drug designations for Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.

Drug

Therapy type

Regulator

Orphan designation

Approval

Sponsor

Exenatide

peptides

EMA

2023-06-20

Boyd Consultants Limited

Progesterone [BHR-100]

small molecules

EMA

2013-02-08

[INACTIVE] Bhr Pharma Belgium

Apomorphine hydrochloride

small molecules

EMA

2011-05-13

Dr Elkan Raphael Gamzu

cyclosporine; ciclosporin

small molecules

FDA

2010-11-23

Owl Therapeutics

Ciclosporin

small molecules

EMA

2010-10-01

ICON Clinical Research Limited

progesterone

small molecules

FDA

2009-09-03

BHR Pharma, LLC

(-)-(2R)-3-(2-hydroxymethylindanyl-4-oxy)-phenyl-4,4,4-trifluorobutane-1-sulfonate

small molecules

EMA

2008-09-05

KeyNeurotek Pharmaceuticals AG

4-amino-(6R,S)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-L-biopterin dihydrochloride

small molecules

EMA

2006-08-28

veriNOS operations GmbH

Apomorphine hydrochloride

small molecules

FDA

2006-05-23

NeuroHealing Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

dimethyl sulfoxide

small molecules

EMA

2005-03-03

Aop Orphan Pharmaceuticals GmbH

dexanabinol

small molecules

FDA

2004-08-11

Pharmos Corporation

N-3[[4(aminoiminomethyl)benzoyl]amino]propyl]-1-[[2,4-dichloro-3-[[2,4-dimethyl-8-quinolinyl) oxy]methyl] phenyl]sulphonyl]-(2S)-2-pyrrolidinecarboxamide, di(methanesulfonate)

small molecules

EMA

2004-02-23

Xytis Pharmaceuticals Limited

Sodium dichloroacetate

small molecules

FDA

1999-06-14

Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Enadoline hydrochloride

small molecules

FDA

1997-01-28

Warner-Lambert Company

Dimethyl sulfoxide

small molecules

FDA

1994-11-22

Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Explority AI logo

228 Park Ave S,
New York, USA.

At Explority, we build first-of-its-kind AI to bring clarity to the earliest and riskiest stages of pharmaceutical research by forecasting which therapies are most likely to succeed. Explority AI web and mobile applications are properties of the Explority AI Inc., a company registered in the United States (File No. 10320493).
For all questions: support@explority.ai

Copyright © 2026 Explority AI Inc.

Explority AI logo

228 Park Ave S,
New York, USA.

At Explority, we build first-of-its-kind AI to bring clarity to the earliest and riskiest stages of pharmaceutical research by forecasting which therapies are most likely to succeed. Explority AI web and mobile applications are properties of the Explority AI Inc., a company registered in the United States (File No. 10320493).
For all questions: support@explority.ai

Copyright © 2026 Explority AI Inc.

Explority AI logo

228 Park Ave S,
New York, USA.

At Explority, we build first-of-its-kind AI to bring clarity to the earliest and riskiest stages of pharmaceutical research by forecasting which therapies are most likely to succeed. Explority AI web and mobile applications are properties of the Explority AI Inc., a company registered in the United States (File No. 10320493).
For all questions: support@explority.ai

Copyright © 2026 Explority AI Inc.